6/30/2023 0 Comments Writeroom windows![]() ![]() What we need instead, and what’s starting to appear, is a breed of lightweight single-purpose Web applications for basic tasks: writing, communicating, spreadsheeting, charting.Īs the reaction to WriteRoom proves, there is enormous pent-up demand for applications that do one thing well. We don’t need Web recreations of the feature-bloated monsters that our office suites became. As the new generation of so-called rich Internet clients arrives, let’s be careful what kind of richness we wish for. Now with AJAX, the pendulum is swinging back again. The page refresh model was clunky, to be sure, but its minimalism made applications easy to create and easy to use. There were only a handful of core widgets to work with, but that constraint turned out to be profoundly liberating. With the emergence of the Web page as a preferred application style, the pendulum began swinging back toward simplicity. At hospital admitting desks, in accountants’ offices, and at video retail stores, I watch people perform tasks for which the desktop metaphor - with its cluttered surface and overlapping resizable windows - is at best a distraction and at worst an impediment. Sadly, by inviting us to interrupt ourselves more than necessary, our software tends to contribute more to the problem than to the solution.Ĭonsider the effects of the graphical user interface. We are all required to be interrupt-driven in ways that vary according to the circumstances of our lives and our work. The paradox, of course, is that interruptions are vital, too. As we perform the intellectual work that powers the information economy, our ability to achieve focus and flow is constantly challenged by distraction and interruption. Recent research has shown what common sense always should have told us: Computers multitask way better than people can. ![]() And as a result, I’m reminded yet again how cruelly oxymoronic the phrase “productivity software” can be. But thanks to WriteRoom’s built-in support for some of the basic emacs key bindings, I’m immediately productive with the program. It also works seamlessly with multiple monitors, with each one able to edit a different file in a similar fashion.My writing tool of choice will surely remain emacs, that faithful companion of two decades and counting. Unlike multi pane editing, the objective here isn't to fit as much information as possible on the screen, but to block out everything that you don't need right now. Note the lack of menu, status bar, toolbar, line numbers, rulers etc. You can think of it as WriteRoom for Windows, with regular expressions, Python plugins and code editing. In this setup, there's nothing at all on the screen but your text in the center, and a muted scrollbar on the right. Prompted by a suggestion on the forums, the current beta supports this very style. If, like Mark Pilgrim, all this makes you wonder why someone would want a text editor with no features, then I do suggest giving one of them a try, it's a pleasant experience. These are all great for editing prose, but none support editing LaTeX, let alone code. Other options are PyRoom, JDarkRoom and Vroom. So what options do you have? If you're on a Mac, you can use WriteRoom, and which has a Windows clone called Dark Room. Using full screen mode in a standard text editor is a good start, but it's generally not as minimalist as it could be, and the text is all bunched over on one side of the screen. You don't need toolbars, you don't need tabs, hell, you don't even need menus. Sometimes, you just want to focus on what you're writing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |